Pressure is mounting on South Africa’s anti-graft ombudsman to quit after the nation’s top court ruled she lied under oath, with a civil rights group lobbying for her to be struck from a lawyers’ roll.
Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has ignited a political storm since taking office in 2016, finding President Cyril Ramaphosa in breach of the constitution and proposing changes to the central bank’s mandate. Her critics accuse her of legal incompetence and siding with a ruling party faction loosely aligned to former leader Jacob Zuma that has sought to undermine Ramaphosa and his campaign to tackle graft.
Rights group Accountability Now said it’s petitioned the Legal Practice Council to revoke Mkhwebane’s status as an advocate — a lawyer who’s allowed to present cases in the high courts and Supreme Court of Appeal. The council, a statutory body, will discuss the matter on Friday.
“If she is struck off the roll, the next step is to go to parliament and say she no longer has the capacity to fullfil her function,” Paul Hoffman, a director at Accountability Now, said by phone on Thursday.
South Africa’s Constitutional Court on July 22 upheld a High Court ruling that Mkhwebane didn’t understand her constitutional duty in rulings she made in 2017 about the country’s central bank. Mkhwebane put forward “a number of falsehoods” while litigating and acted in bad faith, the apex court said.
A day earlier, Ramaphosa described Mkhwebane’s finding that he violated the constitution and executive ethics code when he misled lawmakers about a campaign donation as “fundamentally and irretrievably flawed,” and said he’d seek an urgent judicial review. The president insisted he didn’t know about the payment made to his campaign to win control of the ruling party, inadvertently failed to disclose it and rectified his mistake as soon as possible.
Public enterprises minister Pravin Gordhan, who Ramaphosa appointed to stamp out rampant graft at state companies, has filed lawsuits challenging the Public Protector’s findings that he oversaw an illicit intelligence unit at the national tax agency more than a decade ago and illegally approved the early retirement of one of its top officials when he was finance minister. Successful challenges would give Mkhwebane’s detractors further ammunition.
She’s also courted further controversy by deciding to investigate whether Ramaphosa administration followed due process when it appointed a new head of South African Revenue Service, and allegations of maladministration in the agency’s recruitment processes.
Mkhwebane, who previously worked at the state security agency and was appointed during Zuma’s scandal-marred rule, has denied playing politics and accuses her critics of trying to stymie her investigations. She’ll oppose any bid to be struck from the lawyers’ roll, her spokesman Oupa Segalwe said by phone.
The main opposition Democratic Alliance has asked parliament to probe Mkhwebane’s fitness to hold office and the legislature’s justice committee will decide whether an inquiry is necessary. Parliament will go into recess on Friday for three weeks, delaying the conclusion of the process.
Firing the public protector requires the backing of two-thirds of lawmakers, and it’s unclear whether that threshold could be reached given deep divisions within the ruling African National Congress, which holds 230 of the 400 seats in parliament.
The fissures were starkly illustrated by revelations that Derek Hanekom, a Ramaphosa ally and member of the ANC’s National Executive Committee, collaborated with the opposition Economic Freedom Fighters in a bid to oust Zuma — which the ruling party eventually did in February last year.
ANC Secretary-General Ace Magashule, who is closely aligned to Zuma, said in a statement on Wednesday that Hanekom was “a charlatan” who was intent on dividing the party. Carl Niehaus, a Magashule aide, told Johannesburg-based broadcaster eNCA that Hanekom should be expelled from the party.
Hanekom, who openly campaigned for Zuma’s removal from office, didn’t answer calls to his mobile phone or text messages seeking comment.
Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any. This report may be copied from a news/channel/magazine/blog/site for knowledge sharing, where PathLegal DISCLAIM any ownership of the content posted and offer NO warranty about the data. In case of any objection, please do write to [email protected]